analysis · result
https://www.google.com/search?smstk=Chhveis4dkVyL3M4Qm40MkFFOXRFa0NOYz0QAQ%3D%3D&smstidx=2&q=que+es+la+neurociencia&udm=50&csuir=1&aep=34&kgs=ff606e862f888f1d&shem=rimspwouoe&shndl=37&shmd=H4sIAAAAAAAA_3WOsUoEMRCGOSu5RrCwuGqwFNx4IFeI7xJmkyE7sJnEyax75bW-kc9wT3U50Epsf_j-79t-3WxfPxaCimrUINIMgZRGLdAIMBh_okBcFMUIZoSiCFxk9z6Z1fbm3LquQ2qGxmEIJbtGqGF6rlpyccjZtwmVvE1LHgV5Hqqkx_tfOpWSZhqQ3dPDtaM3dInQoiUwSWA8nu5Om-_b88b_Z-SMiZobe2NkST-fySfF2D_M7Y9_Nt95iajR7w8vsV6jLogxLMEMAQAA&shmds=v1_ATWGeeNANhKUp2fjUffDHY3VNPtJpKrG5ssMCy-69NGCuSjkCQ&source=sh/x/aim/m1/4&sei=-AkHatyHLaeawbkPj76I0Qs
https://share.google/aimode/LJN0tjmqZYUhncsPt
166 words ·
language en ·
type inconnu ·
rules v0.1.0
C
Needs verification
Overall weighted score : 0.612
La página analizada no es un artículo periodístico, sino una página de bloqueo CAPTCHA de Google que indica "tráfico inusual detectado desde su red". No contiene contenido informativo, opiniones ni afirmaciones factuales sobre neurociencia. El URL sugiere una búsqueda sobre "qué es la neurociencia", pero la página real es una barrera técnica de verificación de seguridad.
Sub-scores
Representative quotes
- « Our systems have detected unusual traffic from your computer network. This page checks to see if it's really you sending the requests, and not a robot. »
- « This traffic may have been sent by malicious software, a browser plug-in, or a script that sends automated requests. »
Methodological notes
ADVERTENCIA: El texto proporcionado no es contenido periodístico. Se trata de una página de bloqueo CAPTCHA (Google) que impide el acceso al contenido solicitado. No hay afirmaciones factuales, fuentes de información, opiniones ni contexto noticioso que analizar. Todas las variables relacionadas con contenido editorial se establecen en 0 o valores conservadoras. El análisis se limita a documentar la naturaleza técnica de la página.
Computation detail
Each step is reproducible from the extracted variables.
Show / hide full trace
Fact / commentary separation
Weight : 0.2 · Score : 0.450
EMI competency : Distinguer une information, un commentaire, une opinion (cycle 4, lycée)
- attribution_ratio = 0/1 = 0.000
- unmarked_density = 0/166 mots → 0.00/1000 → pénalité 0.000
- marker_bonus (transparence) = 0.000
- score = clamp(0.55·0.000 + 0.45·(1-0.000) + 0.000) = 0.450
Variables used
{
"claims_total": 1,
"claims_with_attribution": 0,
"opinion_markers_count": 0,
"unmarked_opinions_presented_as_facts": 0,
"word_count": 166
}
Source traceability
Weight : 0.2 · Score : 0.300
EMI competency : Identifier la source d'une information et en évaluer la fiabilité
- named_density = 0/200 mots → score nommé 0.000
- non_anon_ratio = 0/1 = 0.500
- primary_ratio = 0/1 = 0.000
- links_bonus = 3 liens → 0.150
- score = clamp(0.35·0.000 + 0.30·0.500 + 0.25·0.000 + 0.150) = 0.300
Variables used
{
"external_links_count": 3,
"sources_anonymous_count": 0,
"sources_named_count": 0,
"sources_primary_count": 0
}
Plurality of viewpoints
Weight : 0.18 · Score : 0.270
EMI competency : Repérer la pluralité des points de vue dans un document
- subject_type = mixte
- views_score = 0/3 plafonné = 0.000
- counterpoint_ratio = 0/1 = 0.600
- opinion_penalty = 0.00
- score = clamp(0.55·0.000 + 0.45·0.600 - 0.00) = 0.270
Variables used
{
"contested_claims_count": 0,
"contested_claims_with_counterpoint": 0,
"distinct_viewpoints_count": 0,
"subject_type": "mixte"
}
Expression of uncertainty
Weight : 0.14 · Score : 1.000
EMI competency : Comprendre qu'une information peut être incomplète, provisoire ou réfutable
- calibration = bien_calibré → 1.00
- hedging_present = False → bonus 0.00
- premature_conclusions = 0 → pénalité 0.000
- score = clamp(1.00 + 0.00 - 0.000) = 1.000
Variables used
{
"confidence_calibration": "bien_calibr\u00e9",
"hedging_present": false,
"premature_conclusions_count": 0
}
Tone and lexicon
Weight : 0.14 · Score : 1.000
EMI competency : Identifier les procédés de persuasion et de manipulation
- intensity = neutre → base 1.00
- loaded_density = 0.00/1000 mots → pénalité 0.000
- ad_hominem = 0 → pénalité 0.000
- rhetorical = 0 → pénalité 0.000
- sensational_headline = False → 0.00
- score = clamp(1.00 - 0.000 - 0.000 - 0.000 - 0.00) = 1.000
Variables used
{
"ad_hominem_attacks_count": 0,
"emotional_charge_intensity": "neutre",
"loaded_words_count": 0,
"rhetorical_questions_count": 0,
"sensationalist_headline": false
}
Contextualisation
Weight : 0.14 · Score : 0.950
EMI competency : Situer une information dans son contexte historique et géographique
- completeness = non_nécessaire → base 0.85
- perspectives_bonus (hist=False, géo=False, chiffres_verif=True) = 0.10
- missing_essential_info = 0 → pénalité 0.000
- score = clamp(0.85 + 0.10 - 0.000) = 0.950
Variables used
{
"dates_and_figures_verifiable": true,
"geographic_context_provided": false,
"historical_context_provided": false,
"missing_essential_info_count": 0,
"relevant_background_complete": "non_n\u00e9cessaire"
}